|
|||||||||||||||||
Corbis' brandmark update |
|||||||||||||||||
The original r attracted the treatment it was given because rs are tricky. The new r emphasises this fact and offers a poor substitute. Although the overall mark is treated competently the new r is weak and brings attention to the happenstance join-up. It's a passable affectation but it is an affectation and doesn't add any conceptual value to the Corbis brand. I enjoy the rythmns of the original. The pace of the letterforms provide just enough traction to say 'I'm a design-led brand and I care about what designers think'. | |||||||||||||||||
View original post on the Brand New blog | |||||||||||||||||
Top | |||||||||||||||||